|
lishen3
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Name: Lisha Country: Burkina Faso Birthday: 9/29/1990 Gender: Female
Interests: counting taste buds. Expertise: cutting grass with scissors. Occupation: Retired Industry: Entertainment
Message: message me
Member Since:
9/24/2004
|
|
| Elissa Gathman – pd. 1 Honors Physics Mrs. Leach March 10, 2008 Gravity Through Time Aristotle was the first respected person to document significant scientific thought on what would later come to be known as gravity. Aristotle lived in Greece in 384 BCE. He speculated that heavier objects fall faster because the more mass an object has, the more it wants to move towards the earth, because it has so many components of nature in it. Aristotle was a reputable man because he came from a line of brilliant thinkers – he was taught by Plato, who was taught by Socrates. Because of this, many people took for granted that what he said was true. The next person to contribute significant scientific thought on the subject of gravity was Galileo, in Italy, 1564 AD. Galileo was the first to contradict Aristotle’s thoughts on gravity, claiming that all objects actually fall at the same rate. In other words, Galileo was the first to come up with the idea of free-fall. Knowing this, and also taking the factor of air resistance into account, Galileo found the acceleration due to gravity, or g, using an incline. Galileo found that g equals 9.8 m/s^2. However, Galileo was not able to figure out why g always equals this number, he only knew that it was happened. Newton followed Galileo in England, 1684 CE. His first accomplishment was to discover the three laws of motion. The first law of motion, named inertia, stated that objects in motion stay in motion. The second law of motion stated that total force equals mass times acceleration. In other words, both force and mass, and force and acceleration are directly related. For example, if mass stays the same and acceleration increases, force will increase also. The third and final law of motion was the equal and opposite law, stating that every force has an equal and opposite reaction. For example, when you lean on a wall, it “leans” back with the same amount of force, keeping you propped up. Newton’s second big accomplishment was to set the foundation for the universal law of gravitation, stating that force and mass were directly related, while force and distance squared are indirectly related (Fg=mM/d^2 – but this equation was not complete until Cavendish). Newton also explained what Galileo failed to explain – why the force of gravity equals 9.8 m/s^2. The reason, he explained, is because of the second law of motion. In other words, since he knew that force and mass are always directly proportionate, he realized that acceleration must be constant, because F=ma. Cavendish came next, using Newton’s thoughts on mass and force and distance to come up with the full equation for the universal law of gravitation. Cavendish performed the famous Cavendish experiment, in which he was able to see the pull of the force of gravity on a very small scale. He did this by hanging a dumbbell from a string, and placing two large lead weights below the dumbbell. Using a mirror, he was able to see a small twist in the string, and from this, he was able to measure the force between the objects, as well as the mass and distance. Once he had all these things, he was able to use them to find the missing constant in the universal law of gravitation: G. Cavendish found G to equal 6.67*10^-11 m^3/kgs^2. Next came Einstein in Germany and the USA, 1915. | | |
|
http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice.org 2.3 (Linux)">
There is a ring on the right finger of
my left hand that I never take off. The thin golden band has a blue
sapphire on it, surrounded by six sparkling diamonds on either side.
It is not the beauty, however, nor the monetary value that gives this
ring its value. I treasure it for the promise that lies behind it,
the promise to honor the values I have made for myself.
One of my most essential values is
sexual purity. I wish to honor my future husband by saving myself for
him, so that I can one day show him how special and important he is
to me by giving him something I have never given anyone else. I knew
when I made this vow to myself, and to my future husband as well,
that it would be a difficult promise to keep; resisting temptation is
easy for no one. The ring I wear serves as a constant reminder of
this promise. Whenever the heat of passion rises above my logical
thought process, the sight or feel of the ring on my finger helps to
give me enough self-control to overcome my rash moment.
Another essential value I strive to
uphold is to abstain from any illegal use of any kind of substance.
Whenever I am mocked by my peers for keeping my promise in regards to
this value, I touch my ring and remember all the reasons for which I
decided to make this promise. In the same way, whenever I am
discouraged, or tired, or just feeling lazy, I am encouraged by the
sight of my ring to keep going and always try my best, and whenever I
am frustrated with my parents, or have no motivation to listen to
them, a flash of blue from my left ring finger will remind me of my
promise to honor them as my elders, and as the ones who worked hard
to raise me to do so. My ring serves as a tangible symbol of the
values that I seek to honor above anything else in my life.
| | |
|
http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice.org 2.0 (Linux)"> name="AUTHOR" content="Elissa Gathman"> name="CREATED" content="20080109;21222700"> name="CHANGEDBY" content="Elissa Gathman"> name="CHANGED" content="20080110;161500">
SAY WHO WE PICKED!!
How many electoral votes do each of
the candidates bring to the team and why? (Which states,
particularly the most populated ones, or regions?)
Michael
Huckabee won the Iowa Caucus for the Republicans. This is an
encouraging win for Huckabee, as Iowa is not an extremely republican
state, but rather split evenly between republicans and democrats. New
Hampshire, like Iowa, is also evenly split between republicans and
democrats. Yet even here, Huckabee managed to place third. Another
promising state for Huckabee is Arkansas. Not only was Huckabee was
born and raised in Arkansas, he was also governor there for two
consecutive terms, from 1998 through 2006. He is the only republican
in Arkansas who has held the governors office for so long. This shows
that he is very well liked in this state. According to polls
(www.presidentpolls2008.com), Huckabee is also highly popular and
both North and South Carolina. The reason for this lies in the fact
that both these states are highly republican, and in a much more
republican area. Not only this, but they are both in the south-east,
near Arkansas. For the same reasons as North and South Carolina,
Huckabee is also highly popular in Oklahoma, one of Arkansas
neighboring states, and Georgia. All together, these seven states
bring 62 electoral votes. Though this is only a fraction of the 270
votes Huckabee needs to win, his popularity in the two caucuses so
far will soon attract the attention and favor of republicans in other
states.
Rudy
Giuliani's most important electoral vote contribution to the team is
through New York. Though a democratic state, Giuliani is extremely
popular in it, due greatly to his great success as mayor of New York.
Giuliani was elected mayor of New York in 1993, and again in 1997,
winning the latter by a wide margin, carrying for out of the five
boroughs. This alone shows his popularity among the people of New
York. Not only this, but New York is also Giuliani's home state, as
well as the state in which he went to college and law school.
Furthermore, Giuliani served as a U.S. attorney for the Southern
District of New York in 1983. Giuliani's popularity in New York even
spilled over into New Jersey and Pennsylvania, at a 38% and 27%
(respectively) popularity rate according to polls.
(www.presidentpolls2008.com). While the state of Pennsylvania is
split between democrats and republicans, New Jersey is another highly
democratic state where Giuliani is still extremely popular. Finally,
the latest polls show Giuliani's popularity rating at a fairly high
27% (www.presidentpolls2008.com) in both Florida and California. This
is likely due to his popularity with the democrats in New York and
New Jersey, since California is a highly democratic state, and
Florida is not completely republican either. All together, these 5
states bring 149 votes. Winning California would be a huge
accomplishment for the team. If it is managed, it is almost certain
that Huckabee and Giuliani together can win the election.
Which
demographic groups do each of the candidates bring to the team, and
which demographics groups are offended by each of the candidates in
the team?
Wei's
Section.
Which
interest groups do each of the candidates bring to the team, and
which interest groups are alienated by your team?
?
What
are their stands of the various you have determined as being most
important in this election, and where do they differ on each issue,
if at all?
Rudy
Giuliani and Mike Huckabee are both Republican candidates and share
many of the same views on issues. These views or standpoints on the
hot topics in America right now, would help them be a strong
Republican ticket for president in 2008. They are both against
abortion, but Giuliani believes that ultimately the woman should be
able to make the final decision because it is hers. Both are in favor
of keeping illegal immigrants out by means such as a fence along the
Mexico-America border and increased security. Both candidates want to
keep America in the Iraq war and not leave until we have accomplished
what we came for. They both believe it would be to late to pull out
our troops right now. As far as Health Care goes, they both believe
that taxes should not have to take care of everybody. People should
be encouraged to get their own private health care and use the money
they have earned themselves. They both believe that The US should
look for alternative forms of energy. This would help with our
national security as well as being beneficial to all of the American
people because we wouldn’t have to rely on other countries and the
cost would be considerably less. Their ideas on taxes follow the same
idea but are not entirely the same. Giuliani wants to make the Bush
tax cuts permanent as well as terminating the estate tax. Huckabee
believes that we should only be taxed on things we buy, not on the
money we earn. These are both conservative beliefs on the issues that
would be a strong showing for any Republican voter. Both of these
candidates have firm ideas that we believe they would follow through
on to lead this country to victory in many different aspects. They
have a vast amount of conservative ideas that would draw most all
Republicans while still having some liberal ideas that would attract
the democrats. All put together, Giuliani’s and Huckabee’s
stands’ on the issues would make them a great ticket for the 2008
presidential election.
What experience and reputation in government do each bring to the
team, and how does their individual experiences and reputations
compliment one another?
|
Michael Huckabee
|
Rudolph Giuliani
|
Governor of Arkansas from 1996
– 2007.
chairman of the National
Governor’s Association,
chairman of the Education
Commission of the States,
president of the Council of
State Governments,
state co-chairman of the Delta
Regional Authority,
chairman of the Southern
Governors Association,
Southern Regional Education
Board, Southern Growth Policies Board, the Southern Technology
Council, the Southern International Trade Council and the
Interstate Oil and Gas
elected lieutenant governor in 1993
|
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York,
Associate Attorney general in
the department of justice.
mayor of New York 1993 – 2001
|
What
is their electability as defined by the media? (Media presence,
favorable looks, etc)
Huckabee
is a former Baptist preacher, and is deeply conservative. His
religiousness will help get votes from Christians, especially in the
south. He is also a former governor of Arkansas, and has all
of the southern values. This will help him carry the south in
the election. Huckabee is younger looking, so you have the
Bush/Cheney look with a younger, more attractive candidate and an
older, wiser candidate in Huckabee/Giuliani. He is a walking
success story, having lost 110 pounds after being diagnosed with
diabetes to go on to run 4 marathons. He has written 5 books on
bettering one's self. In 2005, TIME magazine named him one of
the 5 best governors in the country. He also wants to stay in
Iraq, so that is a uniting ground for Huckabee and Giuliani.
Giuliani
is a mild conservative, some people even think of him as a liberal.
Giuliani supports abortion rights, gay unions, and curbs on gun
ownership. This will help appeal to Democrats. He was a
former mayor of New York, and will therefore help bring in votes from
the state with the second most electoral votes in the nation.
He is very much for continuing the war in Iraq until he sees it
through, and having been there for 9/11 it seems possible that he
could convince the US citizens that that is the best course of
action.
With
the combination of Huckabee's strong Christian values and Giuliani's
border-line conservative views, we believe these two make a great
combination for the presidency. As said earlier, Huckabee
seems like a kind, gentle, and younger man. Giuliani looks tough and
wise, and does not look like he would take disrespect from anyone.
This combination worked in 2000 and 2004 for Bush and Cheney, and we
believe it can work again. Huckabee can carry the south with his
conservative Christian values, especially having been a successful
Arkansas governor. Giuliani should not have too hard of a time
getting New Yorkers behind him, even if they are running against
Clinton. He should also be able to get votes from other
moderate liberal states in the northeast. These candidates do
not have much to tie them to the mid-west, but these states are
already historically conservative, so we do not believe this will be
a problem. The far west will be the hardest to get, but with Huckabee
and Giuliani's tough stance on immigration, we believe we can also
get the south west, and maybe even California. Overall we
believe this is the best combination of candidates to win the
presidency, and we look forward to seeing Huckabee in the White House
soon.
What skills do
each of them bring to the team, and how do their skills compliment
one another?
bobby
How much money,
or funding, can each bring to the campaign, and from what sources?
bobby
| | |
|
http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice.org 2.0 (Linux)"> name="AUTHOR" content="Elissa Gathman"> name="CREATED" content="20080109;21222700"> name="CHANGEDBY" content="Elissa Gathman"> name="CHANGED" content="20080110;11900">
How many electoral votes do each of
the candidates bring to the team and why? (Which states,
particularly the most populated ones, or regions?)
Michael
Huckabee won the Iowa Caucus for the Republicans. This is an
encouraging win for Huckabee, as Iowa is not an extremely republican
state, but rather split evenly between republicans and democrats. New
Hampshire, like Iowa, is also evenly split between republicans and
democrats. Yet even here, Huckabee managed to place third. Another
promising state for Huckabee is Arkansas. Not only was Huckabee was
born and raised in Arkansas, he was also governor there for two
consecutive terms, from 1998 through 2006. He is the only republican
in Arkansas who has held the governors office for so long. This shows
that he is very well liked in this state. According to polls
(www.presidentpolls2008.com), Huckabee is also highly popular and
both North and South Carolina. The reason for this lies in the fact
that both these states are highly republican, and in a much more
republican area. Not only this, but they are both in the south-east,
near Arkansas. For the same reasons as North and South Carolina,
Huckabee is also highly popular in Oklahoma, one of Arkansas
neighboring states, and Georgia. All together, these seven states
bring 62 electoral votes. Though this is only a fraction of the 270
votes Huckabee needs to win, his popularity in the two caucuses so
far will soon attract the attention and favor of republicans in other
states.
Rudy Giuliani's
most important electoral vote contribution to the team is through New
York. Though a democratic state, Giuliani is extremely popular in it,
due greatly to his great success as mayor of New York. Giuliani was
elected mayor of New York in 1993, and again in 1997, winning the
latter by a wide margin, carrying for out of the five boroughs. This
alone shows his popularity among the people of New York. Not only
this, but New York is also Giuliani's home state, as well as the
state in which he went to college and law school. Furthermore,
Giuliani served as a U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New
York in 1983. Giuliani's popularity in New York even spilled over
into New Jersey and Pennsylvania, at a 38% and 27% (respectively)
popularity rate according to polls. (www.presidentpolls2008.com).
While the state of Pennsylvania is split between democrats and
republicans, New Jersey is another highly democratic state where
Giuliani is still extremely popular. Finally, the latest polls show
Giuliani's popularity rating at a fairly high 27%
(www.presidentpolls2008.com) in both Florida and California. This is
likely due to his popularity with the democrats in New York and New
Jersey, since California is a highly democratic state, and Florida is
not completely republican either. All together, these 5 states bring
149 votes. Winning California would be a huge accomplishment for the
team. If it is managed, it is almost certain that Huckabee and
Giuliani together can win the election.
| | |
| Rudy Giuliani States favorable towards Romney: New York – provides 31 electoral votes Why? - Home State - Went to college and law school here - US attorney for Southern district in 1983 - Mayor in 1993, mayor again in 1997, winning by a wide margin, carrying four out of the five boroughs - Extremely popular in New York, extremely excellent mayor, has made many good changes to public schools, welfare, etc., good leadership | | |
|